Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
Featured picture candidates ![]() Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersHow to nominate in 8 simple steps
STEP 1
STEP 2
STEP 3
STEP 4
STEP 5
STEP 6
STEP 7
STEP 8
NOTE: You don't need to worry if you are not sure, other users will try their best to help you. Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2025 at 14:24:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Muscicapidae_(Old_World_Flycatchers)
Info created & uploaded by Prasan Shrestha – nominated by Kelly zhrm -- Kelly zhrm (talk) 14:24, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kelly zhrm (talk) 14:24, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2025 at 09:54:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info created and originally uploaded by Vyacheslav Argenberg – stitched, edited and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:54, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:54, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:20, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Careful and delicate composition, good quality Cmao20 (talk) 13:16, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2025 at 09:20:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Geology and chemistry
Info created and uploaded by Didier Descouens, nominated by Yann
Info Gypsum with sulphur, Cianciana, Agrigento Province, Sicily, Italy
Support -- Yann (talk) 09:20, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:20, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:54, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support High quality and interesting Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2025 at 09:03:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Iridaceae
Info Parrot gladiolus (Gladiolus dalenii) flower in the monsoon in Ooty, Nilgiri mountains, South India. Focus stack of 38 images. There are no FPs of the genus Gladiolus. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 09:03, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 09:03, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Unusual and effective composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2025 at 04:57:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info Architectural detail of St. Peter's Cathedral, Trier. Beautiful brickwork in various shapes and colors surrounding a barred window. Because the window was high up, I had to take the photo in perspective, which created beautiful oval rings.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:57, 28 July 2025 (UTC)Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:57, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:21, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but this nom one is definitely lacking wow. Poco a poco (talk) 12:03, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Didn't look like much in thumbnail but at full size I definitely see enough interest for FP, it's all about the textures and colours in the brickwork. It's like an artistic study in different shades of ochre and burgundy. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2025 at 01:34:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Tyrannidae#Genus_:_Tyrannus
Info Eastern kingbird (Tyrannus tyrannus). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 01:34, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 01:34, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:13, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:04, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:13, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2025 at 00:58:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Bones_and_fossils#Order_:_Carnivora (new section: #Family : Ursidae)
Info So I had a very fruitful tour of the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology during my trip to Alberta, and the first one I'd like to offer is this cast of an Arctodus simus skull. A. simus, also known as the giant short-faced bear, was found in North America and is considered one of the largest terrestrial Carnivora in pre-history. This skull, ascension number TMP 1988.061.0001, measures approximately 30 cm in length. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:58, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:58, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:20, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 05:59, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:36, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:13, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 14:30, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2025 at 17:13:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Thailand
Info: Thai Mueang Beach, Khao Lampi–Hat Thai Mueang National Park; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:13, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:13, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition for me Cmao20 (talk) 13:12, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2025 at 17:14:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Thailand
Info: unnamed island emerging from Cheow Lan Lake, Khao Sok National Park; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:14, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:14, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:00, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:19, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:02, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:58, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Looks like mild barrel distortion is going on here. Also unsure the top of the island is sharp enough for FP. Nice image but not sure this is one of your best personally. Cmao20 (talk) 13:11, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2025 at 12:00:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
Info A dynamic summer view of the Baltic Sea coast in northern Germany, taken from the elevated Schmiedeberg hill in the town of Rerik. The image shows beach chairs along the sandy shoreline with a subtle diagonal composition, framed by coastal vegetation and a partial view of local architecture. The photo was taken within the Kühlung landscape protection area. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 12:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support The diagonal perspective, contrast between sky and sea, and inclusion of architectural detail were deliberately chosen to create a dynamic and informative coastal scene. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent, could be a painting Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support good quality, pleasant mood. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:30, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 16:07, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support A pretty solid image that has a really good composition. Wolverine X-eye 16:38, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:15, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful painterly composition, striking light from the side, much atmosphere thanks to the impressive clouds, the turbulent sea and the wind-swept blades of grass. – Aristeas (talk) 19:03, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:09, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:22, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2025 at 10:49:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info created and uploaded by Timothy Gonsalves – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:49, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Harmonious composition, the mangrove arch nicely frames the boat. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:49, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support - I wish that third person wasn't hidden by his boatmate, but otherwise this is excellent. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:24, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Agree with nominator and Chris Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 13:10, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nomination UnpetitproleX --Tagooty (talk) 13:33, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 16:19, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting image. Wolverine X-eye 16:40, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:17, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support per UnpetitproleX. – Aristeas (talk) 18:59, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:18, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:09, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:23, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2025 at 06:22:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Genus : Funambulus (Palm squirrels)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:22, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:22, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:25, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:18, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:21, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:19, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support The squirrels' fur color is very similar to that of the tree bark; perhaps this is an adaptation used to evade predators like owls who have excellent eyesight even in low-light conditions. Wolverine X-eye 16:43, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:17, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Typical and impressive squirrel posture, beautiful composition and bokeh. – Aristeas (talk) 18:54, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:01, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:24, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2025 at 21:15:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Cerambycidae (Longhorned Beetles)
Info No FPs of this insect genus. Two FPs of the plant. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:42, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:17, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:20, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support A wonderful collaboration from the plant and animal kingdoms. Wolverine X-eye 16:45, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Very good and beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 18:53, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:22, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:03, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:09, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:23, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2025 at 19:08:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Transport infrastructure
Info created by Деан Лазаревски – uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:16, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Good QI but on reflection I think we can afford to be a little bit picky about drone photos now that we are seeing more and more of them. This one is well composed but the subject and light are not outstanding for me. Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I think this is a pretty good image. There's not much to complain about; at least from my point of view. Wolverine X-eye 16:48, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2025 at 15:07:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Iceland#Southern_Region_(Suðurland)
Info Distant view of the Dyrhólaey Peninsula. All by me -- Jakubhal 15:07, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 15:07, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 17:40, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:33, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Well composed and beautiful for me Cmao20 (talk) 22:11, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:16, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:21, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I'm genuinely impressed by the quality of this image. Wolverine X-eye 16:51, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:18, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Great open landscape, excellent composition which uses the road to direct our eyes to the Dyrhólaey peninsula. – Aristeas (talk) 18:52, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Aristeas --Tagooty (talk) 08:54, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2025 at 14:32:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques
Info created by muzzudan – uploaded by muzzudan – nominated by muzzudan -- Muzzudan (talk) 14:32, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Neutral -- Muzzudan (talk) 14:32, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment Nice idea although unsure quality is sufficient for FP, however you're going to have to improve the description and categorisation. When I looked on the image page this photo had no categories at all which is a huge problem for FP because pictures that we give stars ought to be top tier in terms of documentation and categorisation as well as just good pictures. The image description contains no information as to where this is or what the town hall is. I know that's not the point of the image, but we should still have that information. Cmao20 (talk) 22:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestions. I realize it’s a particular picture and it’s not easy for me to categorize it (besides the fact that I am just a beginner about galleries and categories). I can add more information about the place, but what’s behind the glass is of no special interest honestly. I think the artistic (for me at least) effect of the glass is the real point of the picture. I’ll try to do better next time anyway :) Muzzudan (talk) 14:39, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- I’ve just added few categories to improve the picture. Muzzudan (talk) 16:03, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestions. I realize it’s a particular picture and it’s not easy for me to categorize it (besides the fact that I am just a beginner about galleries and categories). I can add more information about the place, but what’s behind the glass is of no special interest honestly. I think the artistic (for me at least) effect of the glass is the real point of the picture. I’ll try to do better next time anyway :) Muzzudan (talk) 14:39, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Many thanks to Cmao20 for the helpful comment. To make a start with voting: I have often admired the effect of broken windows, but this is a particularly nice example and the photo really shows this very well. – Aristeas (talk) 18:50, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support A subtle, well-executed image that unfolds its abstract clarity and atmospheric mood upon closer viewing. Convincing both technically and artistically. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2025 at 10:27:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Primates
Info created by Davidvraju – uploaded by Davidvraju – nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 10:27, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Theklan (talk) 10:27, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:51, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:12, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:35, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support The eyes of primates are simply captivating. There's nothing like it. Wolverine X-eye 16:53, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:18, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Good and moving portrait of a mother and her child. It would be great if we would know a bit more about where and how the photo has been taken (at a zoo? in which one? etc.). – Aristeas (talk) 18:45, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:01, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Looks great but unfortunately the f-number is too small and that's why the baby is oof. Poco a poco (talk) 14:28, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2025 at 14:59:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Optical_devices
Info created – uploaded – nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:59, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Neutral as Uploader -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:59, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:51, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support. Good focus stack. Small orange fleck at the ! nine o'clock position could be removed. JayCubby (talk) 16:43, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:18, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Good studio photo of an interesting optical device from the past. It’s great that the projector is on – light – and that we can read the brand name around the front lens. It would be a good addition to the description if you could find out when this projector has been produced (year or decace). — Aristeas (talk) 18:38, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:26, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2025 at 11:05:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
Info Michel Alexandre Neuwels, born September 29, 1942, in Molenbeek-Saint-Jean, Belgium, signs his works under the pseudonym Michal, a contraction of his first names. He first worked as a surveyor. In 2017, he won the "Public Prize" at the Montreux Biennale in Switzerland with his work "Les Amoureux." He also organizes the "Sculpture Biennale" in Lasne, which is twinned with the Montreux Biennale. Created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:05, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 11:05, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:47, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — ERcheck (talk). 13:17, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I like it, but did you take one without flash? Just for comparison. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:19, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Info Sorry, no. For these statues are looking in northern direction (as with most of the sculptures on the lakeshore of Montreux) there are always strong shadows from this angle and I used the flash to brighten them up a bit. --Llez (talk) 15:43, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support (⧼Anna Massini⧽) (talk) 13:59, 25 July 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
Support --Cart (talk) 15:02, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:06, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support … and IMHO the Aufhellblitz works really well here, the flash has lifted the shadows a bit without making the image appear flat or artificial. – Aristeas (talk) 18:45, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support. I'll have to remember that trick with the flash. JayCubby (talk) 22:52, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice statues and amazing landscape in the background! Cmao20 (talk) 13:11, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Terragio67 (talk) 16:52, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:35, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:39, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 16:08, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support The background is what really caught my eye, leading me to support this image's promotion to featured status (which is all but guaranteed given the sheer number of supports). Wolverine X-eye 16:57, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2025 at 10:02:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:02, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:02, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:14, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Quaint old rural trifora. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 07:41, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice and simple Cmao20 (talk) 13:11, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:35, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:21, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 18:32, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2025 at 06:17:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info Looking down on the fertile Ketti valley, located on the east side of the Nilgiri mountains in south India. Ketti village in the foreground. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 06:17, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 06:17, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak support - Nice landscape, but the wires are distracting. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:12, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support beautiful scenery; the wires don't bother me but the pole does, however too marginal for me. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:01, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- It would actually make a cool photo if you included more of the wire tangle, wires and pole, and made it a prominent feature in the foreground of the photo (perhaps using a two-photo stack). Sometimes it's better to go all in than trying to conceal something or work around it. --Cart (talk) 15:51, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- @W.carter: Good point, will keep in mind in future. In this case, I was standing on the edge of a cliff with only a small parapet for protection. (I have a tendency to vertigo!
) Not much scope for a better viewpoint. Tagooty (talk) 03:31, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
- @W.carter: Good point, will keep in mind in future. In this case, I was standing on the edge of a cliff with only a small parapet for protection. (I have a tendency to vertigo!
- It would actually make a cool photo if you included more of the wire tangle, wires and pole, and made it a prominent feature in the foreground of the photo (perhaps using a two-photo stack). Sometimes it's better to go all in than trying to conceal something or work around it. --Cart (talk) 15:51, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful for me, I didn't really notice the wires at first and I don't think they are that significant Cmao20 (talk) 12:03, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment Needs denoising, and perhaps increasing the contrast just a bit. Nice photo otherwise. AVDLCZ (talk) 18:02, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Done @AVDLCZ: Thanks for the suggestion. Please see the new upload with NR. --Tagooty (talk) 03:22, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Great view, but impossible to become a FP with those disturbing wires. The wires could be overlooked if this weren't about FP. FPs should be nearly perfect, and the wires detract from the image composition too much in my opinion. Maybe a crop could help. --Milseburg (talk) 12:00, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Done @Milseburg: Some viewers like the wires and buildings in the foreground. As suggested by you, I've made a crop without the wires, proposed as an alternative below. Please review it. --Tagooty (talk) 13:02, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Works for me. Beautiful landscape in the background, the College of Engineering in the midground is interesting and provides some contrast to the landscape, and somehow the wires in the foreground go well with a College of Engineering ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 18:36, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Alternative (withdrawn)
|
---|
Alternative
|
Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2025 at 19:11:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Painted_ceilings
Info Ceiling of Sala dei Capitani, Palazzo dei Conservatori, Capitoline Museums, Rome, Italy. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Obviously amazing Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support This is indeed a high-quality ceiling image. Wolverine X-eye 20:03, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:34, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Magnificent. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 02:52, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 04:25, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:37, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Superb execution, a good addition to the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 09:16, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent quality and composition. – Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:11, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:41, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:04, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Terragio67 (talk) 16:54, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Clear Wow. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:40, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:34, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2025 at 16:45:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#United Kingdom
Info Just realised I asked Kabelleger to upload this and then forgot about it, so here's the nomination at last. I'd support this just as a picture of the viaduct even if there were no train on it, honestly. created by Kabelleger – uploaded by Kabelleger – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:45, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:45, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:50, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:28, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 19:09, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:23, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support but why not change the gallery to bridges rather than trains? The viaduct is the hero of this image, not the train, imo. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:36, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment I agree with you, 100%. But there is a tradition on Commons to add all FPs which feature a train to the Rail vehicles gallery, even if the train is just a supporting actor. IMHO many photos in that gallery would fit much better into the ‘Bridges’ or ‘Natural scenes’ galleries. But I was told that train photographers consider their photos always as photos of trains and would be totally upset if we would move the FPs to another gallery page. ;–) So there are two possibilities: Retain that tradition or break with it. Of course that would need a larger discussion, so if you agree we should open a general discussion on the FPC talk page. – Aristeas (talk) 09:30, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- I understand. I see that so many images in the trains gallery would better fit in the bridges one, and many in the natural scenes or settlements. But if it is convention, we can let it be, it is harmless. We can always use multiple categories (which reminds me that many FPs actually end up not being in any FP category, not even the most basic country or province categories). UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:12, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed. It’s a more serious problem that many FPs are not even in single topical FP category. – Aristeas (talk) 13:15, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- I understand. I see that so many images in the trains gallery would better fit in the bridges one, and many in the natural scenes or settlements. But if it is convention, we can let it be, it is harmless. We can always use multiple categories (which reminds me that many FPs actually end up not being in any FP category, not even the most basic country or province categories). UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:12, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks UnpetitproleX and Aristeas, I've changed it to the bridges gallery. I have never seen David be precious about his photos or insist they are sorted in specific ways and it's my nomination so I am fine changing it. Cmao20 (talk) 19:08, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- I just saw, there's another of David's pictures already in that gallery. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:52, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, the Forth Bridge FP! Cmao20 (talk) 00:50, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you Cmao20 for the nomination! I certainly don't mind which FP gallery is used. In my mind I was there to take a photo of a train (and the viaduct was "just" the setting for the train) which obviously skews my choice of gallery, but that shouldn't stop anybody from choosing what they think fits best. --Kabelleger (talk) 07:30, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your reply, Daniel! It’s good to know that the myth cited above (that train photographers would insist on putting all their photos into the ‘Rail vehicles’ gallery) is not true and that it is OK for you if we put your photos into another gallery, depending on the subject. This makes it much easier for us to select the best gallery in cases like this one where the viaduct is the dominating element in the photo. – Aristeas (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks UnpetitproleX and Aristeas, I've changed it to the bridges gallery. I have never seen David be precious about his photos or insist they are sorted in specific ways and it's my nomination so I am fine changing it. Cmao20 (talk) 19:08, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 04:24, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Agree with UnpetitproleX to change the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 06:20, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support – Question: can a FP sit in two galleries? —Bruce1eetalk 08:05, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Bruce1ee: Short answer: No. ;–) Long answer: We have categories for featured pictures, esp. for featured pictures by subject, and a FP can and should be added to all relevant categories, in this case to Category:Featured pictures of rail vehicles, Category:Featured pictures of bridges in the United Kingdom and Category:Featured pictures of North Yorkshire. It’s one of the advantages of categories that they are not exclusive. But the featured picture gallery pages would spill over if we would add FPs in more than one place. People would want to add their FPs to as many gallery pages as possible, would accuse other people of adding their FPs to too many gallery pages, etc. And it would be very difficult to establish clear rules for that. Therefore FPs are added only to a single place on a single gallery page. That’s not bad because we also have the categories. Imagine the gallery pages as a copiously illustrated book: normally each photo is used only once in a volume, though it may belong to several subjects of the publication. Books handle this with the help of cross references and indices; we handle this with the help of the featured picture categories. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 09:17, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: Thanks for your reply. What you're saying makes sense: FPs are assigned to one gallery, but can belong to multiple categories. —Bruce1eetalk 11:01, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:41, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:28, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:02, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:15, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Terragio67 (talk) 16:55, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:34, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:07, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:34, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2025 at 16:45:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info Beautiful winter landscape from Aristeas. created by Aristeas – uploaded by Aristeas – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:45, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:45, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:29, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support It actually looks like the trees were moving. Not sure why, but it makes this great. --Cart (talk) 19:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I bet that sun felt nice. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:41, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful atmosphere and landscape. Wolverine X-eye 04:17, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Many thanks for the nomination, Cmao20, and thank you all for your support. – Aristeas (talk) 08:10, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:39, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:24, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:01, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:41, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:33, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support To put it poetically: Wunderhübsch. The backlight, the subtle frost, and the layering of landscape elements create a truly enchanting atmosphere. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:48, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:33, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Brings out the beauty of winter --Tagooty (talk) 08:56, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2025 at 15:47:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phalacrocoracidae (Cormorants)
Info created and uploaded by Prasan Shrestha, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 15:47, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- JayCubby (talk) 15:58, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:19, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nice shot. Curious, Prasan Shrestha, how you determined great cormorant vs. indian cormorant? It doesn't look wrong for great (we have those on this side of the atlantic, too), but I know indian can look similar in nonbreeding plumage. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:08, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Great cormorant are very big in size and are winter migratory bird in nepal where as indian cormorant are very rare in nepal and smaller in size with similar teal blue greenish color eyes but small in size similar to little cormorant who has black eyes and similar in size Prasan Shrestha (talk) 23:34, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merlin gets it right as usual... Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:28, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Great cormorant are very big in size and are winter migratory bird in nepal where as indian cormorant are very rare in nepal and smaller in size with similar teal blue greenish color eyes but small in size similar to little cormorant who has black eyes and similar in size Prasan Shrestha (talk) 23:34, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:28, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:59, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Categories added. --Cart (talk) 19:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:24, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:37, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 04:24, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:39, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:59, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Great action shot --Tagooty (talk) 08:27, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:33, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:50, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:30, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Composition. --Mile (talk) 12:03, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2025 at 06:04:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Paramanu Sarkar – uploaded by Paramanu Sarkar – nominated by -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:04, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:04, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment - Title isn't that descriptive; we should have an idea of what we're looking at rather than just a credit to the author. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:53, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Chris for pointing this out. This practice that some photographers here have of putting their names in the file titles is very annoying. Initials are ok if you must do it, but names and info belong in the Exif and on the file page. Names in titles are just tacky. --Cart (talk) 13:25, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Exactly. It's easy enough to set your camera to record your name to the EXIF data. I see that Paramanu Sarkar identifies themselves as a documentary filmmaker, and thus there may be commercial considerations... but at the same there's no reason not to provide some detail about the photograph in the title. Something like "Shepherd from Rajasthan, 2025-04-13, by Paramanu Sarkar" would satisfy any commercial considerations while also providing a searchable and descriptive title. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:22, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Agree with both of you ;–). The most important point is always that the filename is clear, descriptive and as unambiguous as possible without being terribly long. It would show good taste to omit the photographer’s name. But if people insist on adding their name there, well, that’s OK as long as the filename is clear and descriptive. – Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Paramanu Sarkar: Thank you for renaming the photo! – @Crisco 1492 and W.carter: Now we have a more descriptive filename. I have renamed the nomination accordingly and updated (hopefully) all links. – Aristeas (talk) 07:46, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Agree with both of you ;–). The most important point is always that the filename is clear, descriptive and as unambiguous as possible without being terribly long. It would show good taste to omit the photographer’s name. But if people insist on adding their name there, well, that’s OK as long as the filename is clear and descriptive. – Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Exactly. It's easy enough to set your camera to record your name to the EXIF data. I see that Paramanu Sarkar identifies themselves as a documentary filmmaker, and thus there may be commercial considerations... but at the same there's no reason not to provide some detail about the photograph in the title. Something like "Shepherd from Rajasthan, 2025-04-13, by Paramanu Sarkar" would satisfy any commercial considerations while also providing a searchable and descriptive title. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:22, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Chris for pointing this out. This practice that some photographers here have of putting their names in the file titles is very annoying. Initials are ok if you must do it, but names and info belong in the Exif and on the file page. Names in titles are just tacky. --Cart (talk) 13:25, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Good environmental portrait, nice balanced composition. – Aristeas (talk) 07:46, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your support. Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 07:57, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Now that the question of a file name is addressed... impressive portrait. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:09, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- I had no idea about the importance of titles before, thanks to all of you who took all the time to help me out. Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 15:22, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:38, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 15:25, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support great portrait Paramanu, nice expression. And just to add to the noise: I feel it is completely fine to include your name in the title if you can also make it at least a slight bit descriptive. A short descriptive title should obviously be first priority; dates, photographer's name etc are secondary (and redundant since this info is already present at file) but OK to have. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:23, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Agree about dates. Personally I prefer using them in case I revisit the same theme later (compare File:Willistead Manor, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-06-07.jpg and File:Willistead Manor, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-06-10.jpg), but a descriptive title is easily the most important. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:33, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, hope I will come up with titles with more info next time. Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 15:28, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:26, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 15:29, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:22, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 15:29, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 15:09, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 15:29, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Paramanu Sarkar: There is a "Thank you" function that you can use on all Wiki projects. (We usually don't write simple thanks like this on votes.) If you go to the tab marked "History" at the top of a page and click on it, you will see a list of all edits made on that page. Each of them has a little "|thank)" marked that you can use if you want to thank someone for what they have written. Normally we don't thank each voter for casting their vote, it's just our normal job here, but some people like to use them, or if some special help has been given. You can read more about this "Thanks" system at: Help:Notifications/Thanks. Best, --Cart (talk) 19:07, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 15:29, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:43, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 03:57, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:02, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 15:00, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:32, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:51, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:29, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:21, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2025 at 17:18:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 17:18, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 17:18, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment Nice scene, but would it be worth cropping/cloning out the stone at the very forefront? It's cut off and doesn't seem to add much to the composition. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:52, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the feedback. I cropped the stone away from the picture -- FlocciNivis (talk) 16:14, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Interesting subject and good quality but it's a shame it's nearly all in shade. Would be a more obvious FP with better light. Cmao20 (talk) 17:27, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support - I think the lighting is sufficient, with the bright lights drawing the eye to the tunnel. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:31, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Agree that it's original but per Cmao20, probably the bad time of the day. The pile in the front is also disturbing Poco a poco (talk) 19:01, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Contrasting too bright sunlight and subject in shade. --Tagooty (talk) 08:31, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2025 at 16:37:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 16:37, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 16:37, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Lovely mood Cmao20 (talk) 16:48, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:30, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I would prefere a version without people but still good enough.--Ermell (talk) 21:20, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I can almost smell the mist. Fog is well-handled. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:45, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 03:15, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 06:53, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 08:32, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:51, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:59, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:28, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 and UnpetitproleX. – Aristeas (talk) 16:18, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:03, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 19:16, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 00:56, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 06:21, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:27, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:31, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support as per UnpetitproleX. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:53, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:27, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2025 at 09:42:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#India
Info created and uploaded by Vyacheslav Argenberg – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition and an almost Raja Ravi Varma-esque scene. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:56, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Indeed a nice scene. – Aristeas (talk) 16:24, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:45, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:57, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 12:24, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:27, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support So what makes this photo so nice, and makes it stand out from all other photos of these old buildings? Well, the women in their red saris. But why bother mentioning them at all in the description or in the categories, after all they're just women and of no consequence. Right? Now fixed. --Cart (talk) 19:29, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding that, Cart. I was unsure how to describe the scene—they are in the middle of getting clothed, but I can't tell if that act had any special significance (a ritual or something). Now that I think, they may just be changing/drying themselves after a dip in the sea (it is common in India for women to do bathe in the sea fully clothed, and they seem to be carrying towels). UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:58, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- We have women bathing just for fun fully clothed here in Sweden too, they are usually Muslims. But whatever the women in this photo do, they deserved to be mentioned. --Cart (talk) 20:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding that, Cart. I was unsure how to describe the scene—they are in the middle of getting clothed, but I can't tell if that act had any special significance (a ritual or something). Now that I think, they may just be changing/drying themselves after a dip in the sea (it is common in India for women to do bathe in the sea fully clothed, and they seem to be carrying towels). UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:58, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support – Beautifully striking photo. – Ike Lek (talk) 09:04, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:27, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:55, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2025 at 03:03:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Order_:_Hemiptera_(True_Bugs)
Info Northern flatid planthopper nymph (Flatormenis proxima) at night. I was out looking for moths (not much success there), but saw a tiny mobile piece of white fluff moving along the stem of a plan. (This cute little guy is just ~4mm long.) all by — Rhododendrites talk | 03:03, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Note: It looks like there is an existing gallery for planthoppers, but it's for a different family (Fulgoridae -- this is Flatidae). — Rhododendrites talk | 03:03, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 05:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:37, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment Why is the species name not mentioned neither in the file name nor in the file description? Also no information is given about the kind of locality, where the photo was taken. In my opinion the file description is very poor (not the photo!) --Llez (talk) 11:56, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- IDed after upload and forgot to update.
Done now. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:19, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 05:15, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- IDed after upload and forgot to update.
Support Cool creature, beautiful photo. – Aristeas (talk) 16:17, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 19:29, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:21, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:26, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:21, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2025 at 20:08:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support: vivid. JayCubby (talk) 20:47, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:24, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Nearly fifty megapixels - surely one of our highest resolution bird pictures. ISO 5000 means a little bit of noise at full size but when full size is this immense it doesn't matter at all. Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support One of the most visually appealing images I've seen so far. Wolverine X-eye 04:27, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 05:45, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:50, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:59, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 08:15, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 11:48, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:58, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:02, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:50, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:25, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:07, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Sorry to say but the bottom crop is unfortunate and the background is kind of disturbing, Poco a poco (talk) 19:08, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2025 at 15:31:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittaculidae (True Parrots)
Info A Fijian endemic; on the islands of Vanua Levu and Taveuni. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:31, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:31, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice capture, I like that you captured some of the wing movement. However, I did add a 'birds in flight' category, you might want to consider using that in future nominations of flying birds. Cmao20 (talk) 16:49, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:25, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 05:44, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:56, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 11:48, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:58, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:49, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Here comes the party pooper, but sorry, only the eye is sharp everything else isn't and the beak doesn't look good. Poco a poco (talk) 19:06, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2025 at 10:20:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Arecaceae_(Palms)
Info created by Lvova – uploaded by Lvova – nominated by Lvova -- Анастасия Львоваru/en 10:20, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Анастасия Львоваru/en 10:20, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support - Shame the bottom is a bit distracting (between the greenhouse roof and other branches) but the overall composition is just too good to pass up. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:37, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment - Agree with @Chris Woodrich - While the image is great for the most part, the bottom is distracting. I added a note to the image with a suggested crop. — ERcheck (talk). 23:20, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492 and ERcheck: the bottom is cropped. Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:08, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment Excellent picture (composition + motif) but there are large areas of blue chromatic aberration. FP to me if fixed. Cmao20 (talk) 16:48, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. I didn't re-check after QI, but now big areas are fixed. Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:10, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks,
Support now and think it looks much better; however, Анастасия Львова, you'll probably want to tag other voters (especially Sebring12Hrs who specified this as his reason for opposing) to notify them of changes and see if it affects their vote. Cmao20 (talk) 17:29, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks,
--Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:18, 22 July 2025 (UTC)Oppose Purple CAs, sorry.
- @Sebring12Hrs: what's about now, acceptable? Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:07, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Yes good job. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:10, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs: what's about now, acceptable? Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:07, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment I propose to cut the bottom part and to make a square format --Llez (talk) 05:32, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Llez: the bottom is cropped. Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:07, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- I meant a crop like this (see annotation) --Llez (talk) 05:16, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — ERcheck (talk). 01:21, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 04:28, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Good composition, interesting view of the palm. – Aristeas (talk) 07:35, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 11:42, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:06, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2025 at 18:39:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Geology and chemistry#Others
Info An exposed shale formation in Marble Canyon, Kootenay National Park, British Columbia, Canada. I think the interplay of geometry and colour gradation is quite attractive. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:39, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:39, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Agree with nomination - attractive patterns and also a valuable depiction of a geological phenomenon. Cmao20 (talk) 19:19, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:12, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Might not seem like much to the average person but to a geologist or scientist this image is priceless and holds much significance. Wolverine X-eye 03:41, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:35, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose With a static subject like this, the left side should be just as sharp as the right.--Ermell (talk) 09:52, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support per others. --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:09, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:44, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Awesome! --Cart (talk) 19:31, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2025 at 15:05:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#India
Info All by iMahesh (talk) 15:05, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment - Really cool, but I think the birds distract too much. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:28, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- I removed the blurred birds in flight, some of them are on the structure. iMahesh (talk) 18:52, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Very striking Cmao20 (talk) 19:17, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:11, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment The bottom crop seems arbitrary. Adjusting it along the lowest horizontal line would avoid cutting the figure. Otherwise, a good useful addition to the Gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 04:12, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- Please check the alternate option below. iMahesh (talk) 05:22, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Alternative
- Comment: Alternate option with Bottom Crop adjusted. iMahesh (talk) 05:27, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support both, with a preference for this version. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:56, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support This crop is better, thanks. --Tagooty (talk) 06:38, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:42, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:10, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support I agree that the alternative is the better option. Wolverine X-eye 04:47, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 12:01, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Both versions are beautifully detailed, but both are too fragmented for me. They lack a bit of the surrounding. --Milseburg (talk) 15:13, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful building and an appealing clean composition. I like the birds. – Aristeas (talk) 16:17, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:44, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:18, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2025 at 14:04:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Rail_tracks
Info Rail tracks in Ljubljana Train station, Slovenia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 14:04, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 14:04, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment - The railing at the far left is somewhat distracting. Would the composition be better if the border only had the gravel (for example, by turning the far-left track straight using perspective correction)? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:31, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Chris Woodrich it would be better, but i needed digaonale since its more likeable. But it not just gravel, they is some grass too, i have similar, will see and check. I have to rotate to remove cars etc, so just tracks. --Mile (talk) 08:46, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Support This picture has the effect of an optical illusion for me. When I focus on one set of tracks, the others seem to move in my peripheral vision. Anyway, I'm not sure whether the composition 100% works for me but I think it's a cool abstract idea. Cmao20 (talk) 19:14, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:35, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Categories lacking, as usual. --A.Savin 10:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Amazing view, but the crop seems rather random. Not outstanding or stunning enough for FP. --Milseburg (talk) 15:08, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:33, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I concur with Milseburg Poco a poco (talk) 17:28, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2025 at 19:40:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order : Aulopiformes (Grinners)
Info Sauro lizardfish (Synodus lacertinus), La Paz, Baja California, Mexico. The Sauro lizardfish is native to the areas of eastern Pacific Ocean and is reef-associated in a common depth range of about 1–27 metres (3.3–88.6 ft). The maximum recorded length of the this lizardfish is 20 centimetres (7.9 in) but the average length is 15 centimetres (5.9 in). The Sauro lizardfish is recorded to live solitarily and not within a group. Note: there is only one FP of genus Synodus (a different species). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:40, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:40, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support High quality, technically challenging shot Cmao20 (talk) 21:28, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 12:18, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:01, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 04:26, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:40, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:06, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Wed 23 Jul → Mon 28 Jul Thu 24 Jul → Tue 29 Jul Fri 25 Jul → Wed 30 Jul Sat 26 Jul → Thu 31 Jul Sun 27 Jul → Fri 01 Aug Mon 28 Jul → Sat 02 Aug
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sat 19 Jul → Mon 28 Jul Sun 20 Jul → Tue 29 Jul Mon 21 Jul → Wed 30 Jul Tue 22 Jul → Thu 31 Jul Wed 23 Jul → Fri 01 Aug Thu 24 Jul → Sat 02 Aug Fri 25 Jul → Sun 03 Aug Sat 26 Jul → Mon 04 Aug Sun 27 Jul → Tue 05 Aug Mon 28 Jul → Wed 06 Aug
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.